INDOPACOM
This page captures research and analysis by SSI research professors, USAWC teaching faculty, USAWC students, and SSI affiliates, of current and future challenges in the region. Research and analysis will include U.S. approaches and capabilities, U.S. allies and partners, and regional rivalry as the United States pursues its interests.
An Army Transformed: USINDOPACOM Hypercompetition and US Army Theater Design
By Professors Nathan Freier, John Schaus, and William Braun
"In a hypercompetitive Indo-Pacific region, the Army will have to embrace four transformational—and culturally uncomfortable—roles to underwrite future Joint operations and compete with, deter, and—if needed—defeat China in the Indo-Pacific. Embracing these roles will be risky for the Army, but less so than continuing on the present course."
From the National Bureau of Asian Research:
"This report describes U.S. interests in the Indo-Pacific, challenges and opportunities the United States will likely face in the region over the next decade, the resources available to the United States for protecting and advancing its interests, and a recommended strategy for doing so."
The US Is Out of Position in the Indo-Pacific Region
By Nathan Freier, John Schaus, Al Lord, Alison Goldsmith, Elizabeth Martin
From DefenseOne:
"The Secretary of State’s recent dismissal of Beijing’s South China Sea claims is just the latest way U.S. officials are calling out Chinese rhetoric and military activity as a threat to a 'free and open Indo Pacific.'But from a military perspective, the United States is not well positioned to affect favorable change or moderate Beijing’s aggressive behavior."
RT @KelleyCurrie: Since I was cranky about this last week, figured I should update latest info, from @StateDept daily press briefing, on…
Read MoreIf you're thinking about a U.S. military role in the Indo-Pacific, read this. Then consider how your organization can contribute... cc:@INDOPACOM @USARPAC @USPacificFleet @PACAF @PacificMarines
Read MoreModernize the Army for a future conflict? @EricWesleyArmy and Robert Simpson show the way-points in this @WarOnTheRocks piece:
Read More
SSI Live 081 – Addressing Hypercompetition in the Indo-Pacific Theater
Podcast by John Deni, John Schaus, and Nate Freier
COVID-19 & Indo-Pacific Strategy: Korea is Up, China is Down, & the US (For Now) is Out
By John Schaus and Nate Freier
Give Peace a Chance, Just not This Way
By John Schaus
Hypercompetition and Transient Advantage
By Nate Freier, Dana Tucker and Buck Haberichter
OUTPLAYED: Regaining Strategic Initiative in the Gray Zone
Project Director: Nate Freier
In the Pacific, US Army Must Be a Running Back Who Blocks
By John Schaus, Nate Freier, Michael Cable, and Dana Tucker
At Our Own Peril: DOD Risk Assessment in a Post-Primacy World
Project Director: Nate Freier
ZONE DEFENSE: Countering Competition in the Space between War and Peace
By John Schaus, Kathleen Hicks, and Michael Matlaga
This section contains working papers of the 2019-2020 US Army War College Integrated Research Project on the Indo-Pacific Region.
Each Working Paper will be a product of the USAWC INDOPACOM Project on Theater Design and represents the judgment of project’s researchers at the time of publication. Though considered complete, they are subject to further development or amendment with new information or additional work in the future.
The views presented in these working papers are solely those of the authors. They do not represent US Government, US Department of Defense, or US Department of the Army policy.
The First Grid: Historical Context for Transformational Change
By Jon Klug and Nathan Freier
"In the 1930s, the United States clung to neutrality as World War II loomed. Despite pervasive isolationist sentiments at the time, the US Government took several prescient steps to prepare for approaching conflict with hostile regimes in two distinct theaters. This paper highlights key lessons for the United States from the Pacific War that parallel present-day challenges from a pacing PRC."
A Changing Indo-Pacific Region
By John Schaus, Brian Evans, and Elizabeth Martin
"China is increasingly willing to use coercive power to achieve political outcomes aligned with Beijing's wishes. This approach exposes Indo-Pacific states to a difficult choice between China-aligned prosperity and US-aligned sovereignty. This paper presents a snapshot of relations with six US anchor partners' positions toward the United States and China with implications for US military strategies."
Parameters Summer 2020. Geostrategic Net Assessment: INDOPACOM through 2030
By Professors John Schaus and Nathan Freier
Chinese Shipbuilding and Seapower: Full Steam Ahead, Desintation Uncharted
By Andrew S. Erickson, CIMSEC
Assessing the future of Chinese Sea Power: Insights from the “Marine Science and Technology Award”
By Ryan Martinson, Jamestown China Brief,
